Open Access
Subscription Access
The Effect of Fake News on Nigeria’s Democracy within The Premise of Freedom of Expression
Abstract
The study was conducted to measure the effect of fake news on Nigeria’s democracy within the premise of freedom of expression. The study was anchored on four objectives to find out the rate of the spread of fake news among Nigerians on both social and conventional media; to examine the perception of media audience on fake news and abuse of freedom of expression; to find out the effect of fake news on Nigeria’s democracy; to determine measures that can be adopted in combating fake news The study selected purposive sampling and surveyed 60 social media user from Borno and Yobe (i.e, 30 from each of the two states) and administered questionnaire. The study found that majority of the respondents contributes in the information sharing system of media cycle. The study found that despite the awareness of fake news among the respondents, there is limited alertness with regard to sensitivity of verifying information before sharing. The study also found that politics and crisis suffer more fake news than any other nature. The study found that fake news is still crucial because there are rounds of perceptions that influence its nature and thus its spread. We also found that the respondents have negative perception about the extent to which fake news can affect democracy and democratic system of governance. The study recommends that awareness should be created so as to enlighten people who use the social media to avoid spreading unverified information and that other social media platform should copy from Twitter in restricting number of text user can post and identification of a verified account.
References
Bell, E. (2015). Hugh Cudlipp Lecture (Full text), The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jan/28/emily-bells-2015-hugh-cudlipp-lecture-full-text [accessed 17/11/2018].
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J., Nunamaker, J., Twitchell, D. (2004), “Automated linguistics based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication: an empirical investigation. Group Decision Negotiation”, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 81−106.
Buckland, M. K. (1991), “Information as thing”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp. 351−360.
Umeogu, B. (2012), “Source credibility: a philosophical analysis”, Open journal of philosophy 2012, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 112−115
McCroskey, J, Young, T. (2003), “Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades”, Sourced on 17th November 2018 from: http://www.jamescmccroskey.com/publications/96.html
Allport, G. W., Postman, L. (1947), “The Psychology of Rumour”, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Oh, O., Agrawal, M. Rao, H. R. (2013), “Community intelligence and social media services: A rumour theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises”, MIS Quarterly, Volume 37, Issue 2, 407−426.
Adefila, J. J. (2008), “Research methodology in behavioural science”, Kaduna; Apani Publications. pp. 9−11.
Babbie, E. (2008), “The basics of social research (4th edition)”, Australia: Wadsworth.
Fajonyomi, A. A, Fanjonyomi, M. G. (2003). Research process in education and social sciences. Lagos; Goldy O Publishing Company, pp. 48−61.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012), “Social science research: Principles, methods and practice”, USA: University of South Florida
Davies, M, Mosdell, N. (2006), “Practical research methods for media and cultural studies: Making people Count”, Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press.
Adler, E.S, Clark, R. (2011). “An invitation to social research: How it’s done”, Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.