Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Review Paper Risk Management in Railway System

Shailja Pathak, Laukesh Soni, Abhishek Chimaniya

Abstract


A noteworthy worry in rail industry worldwide is to guarantee security in railroad tasks all in all and at street/rail level intersections specifically where the quantity of lethal mishaps has been essentially expanding throughout the years. Mishaps at level intersections are the consequence of complex collaborations between variables emerging from the structure and activities of level intersections. A significant initial move towards dispensing with the reasons for these mishaps is through comprehension and surveying the dangers related with a given dimension intersection and following up on them. This paper presents a hazard the executives structure that fills this need. The recommended structure includes a few exercises, including, peril distinguishing proof, hazard investigation, assessment, treatment and control. Having clarified the proposed structure, this paper represents how it tends to be efficiently connected to alleviate hazard at a given Moroccan dimension crossing. The proficiency and achievement of the recommended hazard the executives structure is pending its reconciliation in a worldwide rail security the board framework additionally presented in the paper.

Full Text:

PDF

References


AS/NZS 4360. Risk Management. Standards Australia, Sydney, 1999.

G. Bearfield, S. Mitra, and E.M. El Koursi, “Guidelines for Safety Management System, D2.2.2/V3.0”, http://samnet.inrets.fr, May 2004.

T. Bedford, and R. Cooke, “Probabilistic Risk Analysis – Foundations and Methods”, Cambridge Press, 2001.

B.S. Blanchard, “System Engineering Management”. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1998. [5] I. Burton, R. W. Kates, G.F. White, “The Environment as Hazard”, Second Edition, Guildford Press, New Yord/London, 1993.

A. Clifton, I.I. Ericson, “Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety”, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

Commonwealth of Australia, “Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis and Alternative Evaluation Methodologies”, January 2006.

EN 50126: “Railway applications—The specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS).” CENELEC, 1999.

CENELEC: EN 50129 “Railway Application: Safety related electronic systems for signalling”, February 2003.

“The Risk Management Standard”. Published by the Institute of Risk Management (IRM), The Association of Insurance and Risk Managers (AIRMIC) and ALARM in 2002.www.theirm.org/publications/PUstandard.html

K. Ishikawa, “Guide to Quality Control”, 2nd rev. ed. Available from UNIPUB/Quality Ressources, One Water Street, White Plains, NY 10601. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 1986.

S. Kaplan, and G.J. Garrick, “On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Analysis”, vol 1, no. 1. 1981.

T. A. Kletz, “Hazop – past and future”. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 55, pp. 263-266, 1997.

WS. Lee, DL. Grosh, EA. Tillman, CH. Lie. “Fault tree analysis, methods and applications—a review”. IEEE Trans Reliab ;R-34(3), pp.194–203, 1985.

L.M.,Leemis, “Reliability - Probabilistic Models and Statistical Methods”, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995.

M. Modarres, “What Every Engineer Should Know about Reliability and Risk Analysis”. Marcel Dekker, NewYork. 1993.

V. Molak, “Fundamentals of Risk Analysis and Risk Management”. CRC Press, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 1997.

C. Raffensberger, J. Tickner, “Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle”. Island Press, Washington, DC, 1999.

A. Berrado, Em El-Koursi, A. Cherkaoui, M. Khaddour Framework for Risk Management inRailway Sector: Application to Road-Rail Level Crossings. Open transportation Journal, BenthamOpen, 2010


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.